No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST
No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST

Benefits, especially PMI, could be ‘reduced or cut’ if employer NI costs go up

by Benefits Expert
01/11/2024
Wages
Share on LinkedInShare on Twitter

RELATED POSTS

staff, short-term, money, Jessica Bird, employers, financial education

Financial education 50/30/20 budgeting rule dubbed ‘terrible advice’ 

Physio, musculoskeletal, cash plan

Unum launches Health Plan 360 in cash plan market shake up

Government pledges that tax hikes will not appear in the payslips of “working people” were repeated at the weekend, but with an increase in employer national insurance (NI) expected in the Budget this week, one expert warned “employees might ultimately bear the consequences”. 

On Sunday, education secretary Bridget Phillipson told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg: “What we set out in our manifesto was that we would not increase VAT, national insurance or income tax on working people. And coming out of this budget, working people will not see higher taxes in the payslips that they receive. That is really important, because we know the pressures that people are under.”

However, the inference tax increases for employers would not affect working people has been described as a fiscal sleight of hand by some commentators as any increase in employers costs could have a knock on effect on employees. 

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to increase employers’ NI in the Autumn Budget on Wednesday 30 October to plug the £22bn black hole in public finances.

But Julia Turney, partner, platform and benefits, at Barnett Waddingham, said: “There is an overall concern about the potential impact of rising employer costs, as employees might ultimately bear the consequences.

“Many employers currently use the savings they receive from national insurance relief on pension contributions, and those made through salary sacrifice arrangements, to boost pension contributions or fund additional benefits like healthcare and life assurance. If these savings disappear, many employers could make the difficult decision to reduce or cut these benefits altogether. This is especially worrying when it comes to healthcare benefits, such as private medical insurance, as employees could be left to pick up the pieces.

“Given the ongoing health crisis, if fewer people have access to private medical insurance, this could place an additional burden on an already overstretched NHS. The budget is an opportunity for the government to take more positive steps toward addressing the health crisis, particularly as we seem to be entering a period of lower interest rates. But if this is left unaddressed come October 30th, it could raise questions about how coordinated the government’s approach really is, and whether they are merely kicking the can down the road.

Next Post
one in five, 20%, lower-earning, UK, employees, £30,000, employer, financial wellbeing, earning less, overseas employees

Could the gamification of group benefits cut staff absences?

Benefits Expert Guide to Protecting Your Employees 2024

The Benefits Expert Guide to Protecting Your Employers 

SUMMIT

BENEFITS UNBOXED PODCAST

Benefits Unboxed
Benefits Unboxed

The podcast from Benefits Expert, the title for HR, reward and benefits professionals.

Seasoned professionals examine the challenges and innovations in today’s employee benefits, reward and HR sector. Every episode, they will unbox a key issue and unpack what it really means for employers and how they can tackle it.

The regulars are Claire Churchard, editor of Benefits Expert; Carole Goldsmith, HR director at the Royal Horticultural Society, and Steve Herbert, consultant and rewards & benefits veteran.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
byBenefits Expert from Definite Article Media

Return-to-office mandates are a topic that’s generating plenty of heat in the media, but how closely do the headlines match workplace reality? 

In this episode, one of a three-part series of 10-minute podcasts, hosts Claire Churchard and Steve Herbert discuss data that shows remote or home working is on the rise.

We look at what this means for HR, from balancing employee flexibility with business needs, to ensuring benefits packages remain fair and accessible. We discuss the pinch points, and the opportunities, in building the new normal of work.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
31/08/2025
Benefits Expert from Definite Article Media
Search Results placeholder

GUIDE TO WORKPLACE PENSIONS



REQUEST A FREE COPY

OPINION

Steve Herbert, consultant, ambassador, reward, benefits, HR strategy

Steve Herbert: The art of the deal?

Lorna Ferrie, legal and compliance director, Mauve Group

Lorna Ferrie: hybrid is not a loophole, remote teams can’t ignore the pay transparency push

Holly Coe, Innecto Reward Consulting

Holly Coe: friendship is an overlooked superpower when tackling workplace absenteeism

Vitality. Pippa Andrews

Pippa Andrews: how to make exercise more enjoyable for women

SUBSCRIBE

Benefits Expert

© 2024 Definite Article Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Follow Benefits Expert

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • In depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
  • Global rewards
  • Financial benefits
  • Health & wellbeing
  • Diversity & Inclusion