No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST
No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST

Claire Merritt: Flexible working changes

by Kavitha Sivasubramaniam
21/09/2023
claire merritt, dependant
Share on LinkedInShare on Twitter

Upcoming changes to the law mean the right to request flexible working will be more extensive. These changes are not yet in force but are likely to be required from summer 2024.

What’s changing?

The changes mean that an obligation will be put on employers to consult with employees before rejecting a Flexible Working Request. In addition it reduces the timeframe for considering requests from three to two months. The Government has also confirmed it will also be making the right to request flexible working a day-one right.

Employees will be able to make two statutory flexible working requests in any 12-month period. Currently, they are only able to make one.

In line with the proposed changes, ACAS has published a consultation on an updated Code of Practice for employers on handling requests for flexible working. It’s designed to encourage employers to take a more positive approach to flexible working and ensure that requests are not rejected by default.

Who can make a flexible working request?

To qualify, the request must be made in writing (such as an email), dated and state that it is a flexible working request. The employee should explain the change they would like and when they want this to apply from and detail whether any previous requests have been made (and if so, when).

What detail should be included?

If a request is in connection with childcare or caring responsibilities or to help manage an employee’s health or disability, then this should be made clear. An employer should be mindful that a refusal could be discriminatory, so should seek advice if needed.

What else should employers consider?

An employer can only refuse a request based on eight business grounds:

  • the burden of additional costs for the business
  • an inability to reorganise work among existing staff
  • an inability to recruit additional staff
  • a detrimental impact on quality
  • a detrimental impact on performance
  • a detrimental effect on ability to meet customer demand
  • insufficient work available for the periods you propose to work
  • a planned structural change to the employer’s business

So it’s sensible to think about issues in terms of these points above and discuss them at an early stage. A good practical idea is to use a trial period; this needs to be clearly defined but can also assist.

What process will an employer have to follow?

Under the proposed changes, employers will have two months to consider a request. An employer should arrange to discuss a request as soon as possible, consider it carefully and only refuse by reason of one of the eight business grounds. An employer must consult with the employee if they are considering rejection of the request. If a request is refused, an employee should be offered the right of appeal.

RELATED POSTS

bonus

Ofwat gains new powers to ban exec bonuses at poor performing firms

Steve Herbert, consultant, ambassador, reward, benefits, HR strategy

Systemic shake-up: it takes HR to do things right

The proposed new ACAS Code of Practice proposes that employers in future must accept a flexible working request unless there is a genuine business reason not to. It also proposes that even where a business reason applies, employers should consider any alternative flexible working options that might be available as part of the process.

What are the legal ramifications if a request is refused?

If a request is refused and an employer has failed to follow the correct procedure, an employee  may have a claim under the flexible working request legislation. These claims are limited to up to two months’ pay in compensation and are also limited to specific procedural failings.

Additionally, requiring people to work full time or in traditional patterns has the potential for indirect sex discrimination; this is due to the impact on those with caring responsibilities, which statistically tend to be women. If a request is connected to a disability, an employer may have also failed to make reasonable adjustments. It’s worth nothing that an employee is protected in law from being treated detrimentally or being dismissed because they made a flexible working request or raised a potential claim.

 

Claire Merritt is partner in the employment team at Paris Smith solicitors

Next Post
government, announced, year, delay, pension dashboards, October, 2026

Convenience guides employer choice of pension provider, DWP finds

AI

AI improving work-life balance, report reveals

SUMMIT

BENEFITS UNBOXED PODCAST

Benefits Unboxed
Benefits Unboxed

The podcast from Benefits Expert, the title for HR, reward and benefits professionals.

Seasoned professionals examine the challenges and innovations in today’s employee benefits, reward and HR sector. Every episode, they will unbox a key issue and unpack what it really means for employers and how they can tackle it.

The regulars are Claire Churchard, editor of Benefits Expert; Carole Goldsmith, HR director at the Royal Horticultural Society, and Steve Herbert, consultant and rewards & benefits veteran.

Benefits Unboxed – Wellbeing: HR is supporting everyone, but who’s supporting HR?
byBenefits Expert from Definite Article Media

As the professionals responsible for helping their organisations navigate NI hikes, rising employee stress levels and looming redundancies, the pressure on HR, reward and benefits teams has never been greater. 

HR is expected to lead with strength and compassion. But who is supporting the supporters?

In this episode of Benefits Unboxed, co-hosts Claire Churchard, Carole Goldsmith and Steve Herbert explore the emotional and ethical pressures HR face today, from managing redundancies to implementing complex legislation. They discuss why HR’s own wellbeing may not be the first topic of conversation, the risks that poses to employers, and the practical steps businesses can take to better support the wellbeing of the people who support everyone else.

This conversation shines a light on the resilience of the profession and why looking after HR is not just the right thing to do, but a business imperative.

Benefits Unboxed – Wellbeing: HR is supporting everyone, but who’s supporting HR?
Benefits Unboxed – Wellbeing: HR is supporting everyone, but who’s supporting HR?
22/05/2025
Benefits Expert from Definite Article Media
Search Results placeholder

GUIDE TO CASH PLANS



CLICK TO REQUEST A FREE COPY

OPINION

Steve Herbert, consultant, ambassador, reward, benefits, HR strategy

Systemic shake-up: it takes HR to do things right

Chris Andrew, EVP, Gallagher

Rewriting the deal: how hybrid and remote work is changing EVPs

Pat Sharman, Everyone Matters

What CEOs don’t know about workplace culture, but should

Jo Werker, CEO, Boostworks

Six proactive ways HR can build a happier, healthier workplace

SUBSCRIBE

Benefits Expert

© 2024 Definite Article Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Follow Benefits Expert

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • In depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
  • Global rewards
  • Financial benefits
  • Health & wellbeing
  • Diversity & Inclusion