No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST
No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST

Goldman Sachs employee wins paternity discrimination tribunal 

by Benefits Expert
06/12/2024
Father and new baby, paternity leave, parental leave
Share on LinkedInShare on Twitter

An employment tribunal has ruled that a Goldman Sachs employee was unfairly dismissed after taking six months of paternity leave and was subjected to direct sex discrimination.

Jon Reeves, vice president of the compliance department in London, had told senior colleagues at the financial firm that he was struggling to manage his work-life balance when he returned from paternity leave in 2022.

He was later dismissed on performance grounds. However, Reeves said that performance concerns were not raised with him until he was on parental leave, and his appraisals showed he was “fully meeting expectations”. 

In an earlier call when Reeves raised concerns about work life balance, he was told “you’re a grown man, you can sort this out” during a call with Omar Beer, the firm’s global co-head of the investment banking division (IBD) compliance, and Tin Hsien Tan, managing director, global co-head of IBD compliance and Asia Pacific head of compliance. 

The tribunal found that Beer was dismissive of Reeves concerns, as a man, about balancing childcare with work during covid lockdown. 

The tribunal also found that the employer subjected the claimant to direct sex discrimination, including allegations of underperformance, reducing his pay, and ultimately dismissing him.

However, the tribunal also said that there was a 50 percent likelihood that Goldman Sachs would have conducted a fair dismissal based on non-discriminatory reasons (IE by making him redundant), if a fair process had been followed. This finding is likely to influence any compensation awarded.

Tribunal judges explained their decision pointing to claims that the employer had treated him less favourably compared to a hypothetical female employee under similar circumstances, particularly regarding performance reviews, redundancy processes, and dismissal.

They also determined that the employer’s actions constituted less favourable treatment due to the claimant’s sex, which breaches the Equality Act 2010.

RELATED POSTS

Neil Mullarkey, communications, expert, author, improv

Why marketing will define tomorrow’s reward leaders

Cancer risk, health check up, health MOT

Reframe Cancer teams up with insurer to offer ‘groundbreaking’ benefit

Goldman Sachs has an ‘equal employment opportunity’ policy, which applies in the UK. Under this policy managers are evaluated in part on the basis of their success in carrying out our equal employment opportunity policies. They are also evaluated on achieving more diverse teams. In a bid to increase female representation in all its worldwide workforces the employer introduced a firm-wide paid leave policy from 8 April 2020. This allows all employees to take up to 26 weeks of paid leave within 12 months of the birth or legal adoption of their child. Goldman Sachs emphasised that its parental leave policy significantly exceeds its legal obligations.

Next Post
older workers

Winter financial wellbeing campaign signs up 100 major employers

rewards

SMEs revamp pension, health and lifestyle perks to attract candidates

SUMMIT

BENEFITS UNBOXED PODCAST

Benefits Unboxed
Benefits Unboxed

The podcast from Benefits Expert, the title for HR, reward and benefits professionals.

Seasoned professionals examine the challenges and innovations in today’s employee benefits, reward and HR sector. Every episode, they will unbox a key issue and unpack what it really means for employers and how they can tackle it.

The regulars are Claire Churchard, editor of Benefits Expert; Carole Goldsmith, HR director at the Royal Horticultural Society, and Steve Herbert, consultant and rewards & benefits veteran.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
byBenefits Expert from Definite Article Media

Return-to-office mandates are a topic that’s generating plenty of heat in the media, but how closely do the headlines match workplace reality? 

In this episode, one of a three-part series of 10-minute podcasts, hosts Claire Churchard and Steve Herbert discuss data that shows remote or home working is on the rise.

We look at what this means for HR, from balancing employee flexibility with business needs, to ensuring benefits packages remain fair and accessible. We discuss the pinch points, and the opportunities, in building the new normal of work.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
31/08/2025
Benefits Expert from Definite Article Media
Search Results placeholder

GUIDE TO PROTECTING YOUR WORKFORCE



REQUEST A FREE COPY

OPINION

Neil Mullarkey, communications, expert, author, improv

Why marketing will define tomorrow’s reward leaders

Steve Herbert, consultant, ambassador, reward, benefits, HR strategy

Steve Herbert: The art of the deal?

Lorna Ferrie, legal and compliance director, Mauve Group

Lorna Ferrie: hybrid is not a loophole, remote teams can’t ignore the pay transparency push

Holly Coe, Innecto Reward Consulting

Holly Coe: friendship is an overlooked superpower when tackling workplace absenteeism

SUBSCRIBE

Benefits Expert

© 2024 Definite Article Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Follow Benefits Expert

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • In depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
  • Global rewards
  • Financial benefits
  • Health & wellbeing
  • Diversity & Inclusion