No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST
No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST

Hunt revisits aim to abolish ‘most economically damaging tax’

by Benefits Expert
17/05/2024
Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt, government, UK
Share on LinkedInShare on Twitter

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has called employee national insurance contributions (NIC) “the most economically damaging tax” as he reiterated his ambition to abolish it. 

Speaking at a Conservative event in Westminster today, he said his party would continue to “bring down taxes… because that is already what we have been doing”.

Employee NI was reduced from 10 percent to 8 percent in the 2024 Spring Budget, with changes coming into force on 6 April, 2024. Prior to this the tax was reduced from 12 percent to 10 percent in January of the same year.

Hunt said that cutting employee NI would help grow the UK economy and that this was also the view of the Office of Budget Responsibility.  

Large income stream

Steve Herbert, an employee benefits, wellbeing and reward consultant, questioned the practicality of getting rid of employee NI as it represents such a large income stream for the Treasury.

He said: “It’s not something that can be dealt with easily, not least when the nation’s finances are so delicate as is the case currently.”

Herbert suggested that Hunt’s ambition might be limited to just abolishing employee NI contributions for middle-band earnings and not the highest levels of earnings. 

“This would be consistent with the two recent reductions in employed NI that have only been experienced by that middle-band grouping.

RELATED POSTS

health screening, NHS, employee benefits, wellbeing, preventative, health checks

Employer uptake of health screening rises as over half a million miss NHS checks

Digital-riches-lost-pension-savings-money-retirement

Employees want support to better understand how much to save for retirement

Benefits side effects

Asked what scrapping national insurance would mean for benefits such as salary sacrifice among others, Herbert said: “Reducing NI is generally seen as a plus for employee finances, but does have the side effect of reducing the appeal of benefits funded via salary sacrifice.

“That reduction in appeal won’t be felt as yet – and will probably be felt to be only marginal even when the recent changes are communicated – but to remove the personal NI saving altogether would make salary sacrifice a much harder ‘sell’ to employees.”

Herbert said this is important because the employer’s NI saving from some salary sacrifice benefits (most often pension contributions) is often used to fund other elements of the reward and benefits offerings. 

“The employer is therefore rather reliant on employees volunteering to use salary sacrifice benefits in the first place. If they don’t, then employers will either have to find extra funding or benefit packages will be downgraded.”

Hunt himself has previously admitted that totally scrapping employee NI was a “long term ambition”, which “is going to be the work of many parliaments”, when he spoke during a Treasury committee session a week after the 2024 spring budget in March.

Next Post
Saving, saver, savings, piggy bank

Inflation shock reshapes UK saver behaviour; savers bank £54 billion a year

Patrick Glencross, senior associate, Furley Page, law firm

Employers unaware of ‘significant’ holiday rights and pay changes, warns law firm

SUMMIT

BENEFITS UNBOXED PODCAST

Benefits Unboxed
Benefits Unboxed

The podcast from Benefits Expert, the title for HR, reward and benefits professionals.

Seasoned professionals examine the challenges and innovations in today’s employee benefits, reward and HR sector. Every episode, they will unbox a key issue and unpack what it really means for employers and how they can tackle it.

The regulars are Claire Churchard, editor of Benefits Expert; Carole Goldsmith, HR director at the Royal Horticultural Society, and Steve Herbert, consultant and rewards & benefits veteran.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
byBenefits Expert from Definite Article Media

Return-to-office mandates are a topic that’s generating plenty of heat in the media, but how closely do the headlines match workplace reality? 

In this episode, one of a three-part series of 10-minute podcasts, hosts Claire Churchard and Steve Herbert discuss data that shows remote or home working is on the rise.

We look at what this means for HR, from balancing employee flexibility with business needs, to ensuring benefits packages remain fair and accessible. We discuss the pinch points, and the opportunities, in building the new normal of work.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
31/08/2025
Benefits Expert from Definite Article Media
Search Results placeholder

GUIDE TO WORKPLACE PENSIONS



REQUEST A FREE COPY

OPINION

Steve Herbert, consultant, ambassador, reward, benefits, HR strategy

Steve Herbert: The art of the deal?

Lorna Ferrie, legal and compliance director, Mauve Group

Lorna Ferrie: hybrid is not a loophole, remote teams can’t ignore the pay transparency push

Holly Coe, Innecto Reward Consulting

Holly Coe: friendship is an overlooked superpower when tackling workplace absenteeism

Vitality. Pippa Andrews

Pippa Andrews: how to make exercise more enjoyable for women

SUBSCRIBE

Benefits Expert

© 2024 Definite Article Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Follow Benefits Expert

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • In depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
  • Global rewards
  • Financial benefits
  • Health & wellbeing
  • Diversity & Inclusion