No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST
No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST

Make smaller employers report ethnicity pay data: SPP

by Emma Simon
08/10/2025
Race, pay
Share on LinkedInShare on Twitter

The Society of Pension Professionals is calling for smaller employers to be included in new ethnicity pay reporting standards, to improve transparency and narrow the ethnicity pay gap. 

The Government is currently proposing to introduce legal requirements for large employers to report pay gaps by both ethnicity and by disability. This will follow a similar structure to gender pay requirements.

However in its response to this consultation the SPP said it would like to see current proposals go further. It says its report into this issue finds “compelling evidence” that these mandatory proposals should “specifically include mid-size employers  [those with 50 to 249 staff] into this new regime.”

It says these firms account for more than 4.1m jobs across the private sector and are particularly dominant in local and regional economies and in sectors where racially minoritised workers are often over-represented.  

The SPP points out many firms already have structured HR and payroll systems in place, and evidence from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) shows that a majority are already collecting some form of ethnicity data. 

Jabeer Butt OBE, chief executive, Race Equality Foundation who contribute to his report says: “The current voluntary approach has clearly reached its limits. Where reporting is optional, it remains patchy, inconsistent, and lacking in both context and follow-up. Moreover, even among those who do report, few set clear targets or publish concrete actions in response to their findings.”

He pointed out that what is often missing form the reporting done by these firms “is the external requirement and support to report it transparently and act on the insights.” 

The SPP is recommending a phased implementation approach, with the largest employers required to report this data first. 

It said that alongside the requirement to publish data “accessible guidance, sector-specific example and technical support should be provided to ensure organisation of all sizes can comply meaningfully.” 

RELATED POSTS

Benefits Expert Summit 2025: Focus on output key to flexible working success

Benefits Expert Summit 2025: Focus on output key to flexible working success

benefits dashboard, digital interface, pensions dashboard, financial, wellbeing

Unum offers simplified benefits administration via new platform

Butt adds: “Without the inclusion of mid-sized firms the proposed legislation risks leaving millions of workers outside the reach of transparency and accountability. It will also reinforce the misconception that only large companies bear responsibility for pay equity – and in turn pension equity. In reality all employers have a role to play in dismantling structural inequality.” 

The SPP adds: “Ethnicity pay gap reporting can be a powerful level for change but only if it is bold in scope, intersectional in focus and inclusive of the employers that shape the everyday realities of the UK workforce.” 

Next Post
Benefits Expert Summit 2025: Focus on output key to flexible working success

Benefits Expert Summit 2025: Focus on output key to flexible working success

SUMMIT

BENEFITS UNBOXED PODCAST

Benefits Unboxed
Benefits Unboxed

The podcast from Benefits Expert, the title for HR, reward and benefits professionals.

Seasoned professionals examine the challenges and innovations in today’s employee benefits, reward and HR sector. Every episode, they will unbox a key issue and unpack what it really means for employers and how they can tackle it.

The regulars are Claire Churchard, editor of Benefits Expert; Carole Goldsmith, HR director at the Royal Horticultural Society, and Steve Herbert, consultant and rewards & benefits veteran.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
byBenefits Expert from Definite Article Media

Return-to-office mandates are a topic that’s generating plenty of heat in the media, but how closely do the headlines match workplace reality? 

In this episode, one of a three-part series of 10-minute podcasts, hosts Claire Churchard and Steve Herbert discuss data that shows remote or home working is on the rise.

We look at what this means for HR, from balancing employee flexibility with business needs, to ensuring benefits packages remain fair and accessible. We discuss the pinch points, and the opportunities, in building the new normal of work.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
31/08/2025
Benefits Expert from Definite Article Media
Search Results placeholder

GUIDE TO CASH PLANS



REQUEST A FREE COPY

OPINION

Luke McClaran, chief people officer, Vitality

Luke McClaran: prevention pays, why employer health checks matter

Duncan Brown, principal associate, Institute for Employment Studies, pay. reward, work

From ‘boat people’ to boardrooms: HR can help reshape migration mindsets

Neil Mullarkey, communications, expert, author, improv

Why marketing will define tomorrow’s reward leaders

Steve Herbert, consultant, ambassador, reward, benefits, HR strategy

Steve Herbert: The art of the deal?

SUBSCRIBE

Benefits Expert

© 2024 Definite Article Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Follow Benefits Expert

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • In depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
  • Global rewards
  • Financial benefits
  • Health & wellbeing
  • Diversity & Inclusion