No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST
No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST

Nursery places as a benefit in kind: what employers need to know

by Benefits Expert
07/08/2024
Shawn Healy, BDO
Share on LinkedInShare on Twitter

As working parents struggle to afford childcare, employers will be tempted to take advantage of nursery schemes offering employees tax/NIC free care, and rightly so. Shawn Healey, an employment tax principal at BDO, sounds a note of caution as he highlights a number of qualifying conditions employers need to meet.

In recent months interest has grown in schemes offering nursery places funded by an arrangement involving employers, independent nurseries, a scheme provider and an employee (and parent).

Commonly marketed schemes claim to provide nursery childcare on a tax/national insurance contribution (NIC) free basis. This is possible by accessing a tax exemption that allows uncapped provision. However, the nursery tax exemption (s318 ITEPA 2003) contains a number of qualifying conditions which are subject to interpretation.

How the exemption works

The nursery exemption was first introduced to provide tax relief for employers who could provide suitable premises where a nursery could be set up. But there are four conditions in S318 that need to be met before the exemption applies.

One key condition covers the premises used for the nursery. To be fair to the many employers that would not be able to use their own premises, this premises condition allows for “partnership arrangements” to enable employers without suitable premises to take advantage of the exemption. It is this element of the exemption many of the current commercially available schemes seek to use.

For a partnership arrangement to qualify, the employer must be responsible for all or part of the ‘financing and management’ of the nursery in question.

Commercially marketed schemes

There are many ways in which third party providers have sought to offer employers an arrangement that can offer tax/NIC-free nursery-based childcare. The current schemes appear to contain the same key components:

RELATED POSTS

Steve Herbert, consultant, ambassador, reward, benefits, HR strategy

Systemic shake-up: it takes HR to do things right

Sam Seaton, CEO, CAPAdata.com, pensions, scrutiny, transparency, value for money, pensions schemes bill

Pensions transparency enters new phase as CAPAdata launches platform with trailblazer CEO

  • An employee enters into a salary sacrifice agreement which covers the cost of the childcare at a nursery of their choosing (i.e. not on premises provided by or chosen by the employer);
  • The salary sacrificed includes an additional financial contribution, typically £100 – £150 per month, which the scheme provider purports will meet the employer financing requirement – presumably because these funds are paid to the nursery by the employer;
  • The employee then acts as the representative of their employer and attends meetings (real or virtual) to fulfil the ‘management’ requirement of the tax exemption, and
  • The scheme provider enters into a commercial arrangement with the employer and acts in a co-ordination role to ensure the arrangement runs smoothly.

Financing and managing the nursery

The legislation (s318 (7) (c)) states “that under the arrangements the scheme employer is wholly or partly responsible for financing and managing the provision of the care”. Applying this statement to live situations can be difficult.

In the government’s Agent Update (Issue 121) published on 17 July 2024, HMRC outlined that for such marketed schemes it does not consider that a monthly payment meets the financing test. Similarly, HMRC now describes “managing” (not further defined in the legislations), as meaning that employers must play a real part in the management of the nursery, or nurseries concerned.

Interpreting the conditions

The Agent Update expands on pre-existing guidance in the HMRC Employer Income Manual (section EIM22007) which gives examples of how HMRC sees the exemption applying. 

Stepping back from the detail, one can see that the points it raises are open to subjective interpretation and, while HMRC’s guidance is clear, it is only HMRC’s view of the law.

Unhelpfully, the only case law in this area is Lotus Group Ltd v RCC. The taxpayer won its case at the First Tier Tribunal on the basis that:

  • The employer had agreed to undertake maintenance, improvements and redecoration of the nursery as well as paying £500 per child – i.e. made an identifiable financial commitment (rather than a “token gesture” mentioned in HMRC’s guidance).
  • It was also the third party agent that met with the nursery on behalf of the employer (rather than the employee).

These differences mean the ruling has limited application to the current schemes. For example, in the context of the financial commitment, the employer was directly funding the places rather than simply passing on the monies collected from employees via salary sacrifice. The ‘management’ circumstances are also different. This emphasises an employer-focused involvement in, and financial commitment to, a nursery rather than the employee-focused approach taken by current marketed schemes.

What are the options now?

Employers who are approached by an employee that wants the organisation to implement one of the current schemes or that are thinking of adding this to their employee benefits offering, should take care. As the rules are interpreted by HMRC, they will likely challenge the use of third party schemes as they do not believe they will qualify for the exemption.

Of course, that doesn’t mean that nursery provision is impossible. Each childcare scenario can be different, and some arrangements will definitely qualify for the exemption – benefiting all parties. So, the best approach is to involve employment tax specialists at an early stage to help employers take a measured view of their specific circumstances and the options available for providing this valuable benefit.

Next Post
healthy workplace goals, exercise, wellbeing, stress

Five ways to set healthy goals in the workplace

Maiyuresh Rajah, Aviva, investments, pensions

Aviva appoints innovative director to key wealth investment role

SUMMIT

BENEFITS UNBOXED PODCAST

Benefits Unboxed
Benefits Unboxed

The podcast from Benefits Expert, the title for HR, reward and benefits professionals.

Seasoned professionals examine the challenges and innovations in today’s employee benefits, reward and HR sector. Every episode, they will unbox a key issue and unpack what it really means for employers and how they can tackle it.

The regulars are Claire Churchard, editor of Benefits Expert; Carole Goldsmith, HR director at the Royal Horticultural Society, and Steve Herbert, consultant and rewards & benefits veteran.

Benefits Unboxed – Wellbeing: HR is supporting everyone, but who’s supporting HR?
byBenefits Expert from Definite Article Media

As the professionals responsible for helping their organisations navigate NI hikes, rising employee stress levels and looming redundancies, the pressure on HR, reward and benefits teams has never been greater. 

HR is expected to lead with strength and compassion. But who is supporting the supporters?

In this episode of Benefits Unboxed, co-hosts Claire Churchard, Carole Goldsmith and Steve Herbert explore the emotional and ethical pressures HR face today, from managing redundancies to implementing complex legislation. They discuss why HR’s own wellbeing may not be the first topic of conversation, the risks that poses to employers, and the practical steps businesses can take to better support the wellbeing of the people who support everyone else.

This conversation shines a light on the resilience of the profession and why looking after HR is not just the right thing to do, but a business imperative.

Benefits Unboxed – Wellbeing: HR is supporting everyone, but who’s supporting HR?
Benefits Unboxed – Wellbeing: HR is supporting everyone, but who’s supporting HR?
22/05/2025
Benefits Expert from Definite Article Media
Search Results placeholder

GUIDE TO CASH PLANS



CLICK TO REQUEST A FREE COPY

OPINION

Steve Herbert, consultant, ambassador, reward, benefits, HR strategy

Systemic shake-up: it takes HR to do things right

Chris Andrew, EVP, Gallagher

Rewriting the deal: how hybrid and remote work is changing EVPs

Pat Sharman, Everyone Matters

What CEOs don’t know about workplace culture, but should

Jo Werker, CEO, Boostworks

Six proactive ways HR can build a happier, healthier workplace

SUBSCRIBE

Benefits Expert

© 2024 Definite Article Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Follow Benefits Expert

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • In depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
  • Global rewards
  • Financial benefits
  • Health & wellbeing
  • Diversity & Inclusion