No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST
No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST

Regulator risks missing pension scheme ‘nuances’ that employers value

by Benefits Expert
21/10/2024
pension pot
Share on LinkedInShare on Twitter

Regulator proposals to assess the value of workplace pensions risk missing the nuances in value that different employers and members get from each scheme, consultants have warned in response to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) proposals for its Value for Money Framework (VfMF).

The aim of the FCA’s VfMF is to reduce the number of savers with defined contribution pensions that deliver poor value and encourage better value for money across the workplace DC market.

Consultants at Broadstone said the proposed one-size fits all approach could miss the nuances that make them valuable to their members.

For example, small employers may prefer consistent and high-quality pension providers, while, larger organisations typically prefer more bespoke provider services, such as a greater range of investment products and communication strategies.

Vanilla arrangements 

It said that any ‘like with like’ comparison should avoid scrutinising more ‘vanilla’ pension arrangements for not reaching standards they have not needed or promised to meet.

Consultants raised major concerns about the ‘Red, Amber, Green’ (RAG) rating proposals that the FCA plans to use.

It said that while simplicity and engagement is critical, the RAG system is “so reductionist that it risks draconian outcomes for those falling under the amber rating”. 

There is also a lack of focus on the ‘decumulation stage’, which are key for member outcomes at retirement. 

RELATED POSTS

Neil Mullarkey, communications, expert, author, improv

Why marketing will define tomorrow’s reward leaders

Cancer risk, health check up, health MOT

Reframe Cancer teams up with insurer to offer ‘groundbreaking’ benefit

David Brooks, head of policy at Broadstone, said: “We welcome the consultation and fully support the FCA’s efforts to create a consistent, transparent measure of value for money across all colours and stripes of defined contribution schemes. It’s a crucial step towards enhancing member engagement and improving long-term outcomes for savers.

“However, while standardised and clear-cut performance metrics are essential, it’s equally important that the framework recognises the unique characteristics of different pension arrangements. A one-size-fits-all approach risks overlooking the individual strengths of various schemes, especially those offering tailored services to specific employers or members.

“The proposed ‘Red, Amber, Green’ (RAG) rating system, in its current form, may unintentionally subject high-performing schemes to unfair scrutiny, meanwhile, a heavy focus on accumulation risks long-term VfMF for savers in later life.

“It’s critical that any framework preserves the nuances that make different schemes valuable to their members, rather than penalising them for not conforming to a standard they were never intended to meet.”

 

Next Post
Mark Pugh, Head of Consulting Services, Towergate Employee Benefits

Towergate creates new leadership role as part of ambitious benefits growth plans

Pay rise, wage increase, cost of living, pay alternatives, benefits, reward, income

Employers to see cost hikes if chancellor adds NI to pension contributions and scraps EV salary sacrifice 

SUMMIT

BENEFITS UNBOXED PODCAST

Benefits Unboxed
Benefits Unboxed

The podcast from Benefits Expert, the title for HR, reward and benefits professionals.

Seasoned professionals examine the challenges and innovations in today’s employee benefits, reward and HR sector. Every episode, they will unbox a key issue and unpack what it really means for employers and how they can tackle it.

The regulars are Claire Churchard, editor of Benefits Expert; Carole Goldsmith, HR director at the Royal Horticultural Society, and Steve Herbert, consultant and rewards & benefits veteran.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
byBenefits Expert from Definite Article Media

Return-to-office mandates are a topic that’s generating plenty of heat in the media, but how closely do the headlines match workplace reality? 

In this episode, one of a three-part series of 10-minute podcasts, hosts Claire Churchard and Steve Herbert discuss data that shows remote or home working is on the rise.

We look at what this means for HR, from balancing employee flexibility with business needs, to ensuring benefits packages remain fair and accessible. We discuss the pinch points, and the opportunities, in building the new normal of work.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
31/08/2025
Benefits Expert from Definite Article Media
Search Results placeholder

GUIDE TO PROTECTING YOUR WORKFORCE



REQUEST A FREE COPY

OPINION

Neil Mullarkey, communications, expert, author, improv

Why marketing will define tomorrow’s reward leaders

Steve Herbert, consultant, ambassador, reward, benefits, HR strategy

Steve Herbert: The art of the deal?

Lorna Ferrie, legal and compliance director, Mauve Group

Lorna Ferrie: hybrid is not a loophole, remote teams can’t ignore the pay transparency push

Holly Coe, Innecto Reward Consulting

Holly Coe: friendship is an overlooked superpower when tackling workplace absenteeism

SUBSCRIBE

Benefits Expert

© 2024 Definite Article Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Follow Benefits Expert

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • In depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
  • Global rewards
  • Financial benefits
  • Health & wellbeing
  • Diversity & Inclusion