No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST
No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST

Workers expect a £30k yearly retirement income but many face up to £18K shortfall

by Benefits Expert
25/07/2025
retired couple on yacht, pension, timebomb, retirement, savings
Share on LinkedInShare on Twitter

People aged 40-75 who are yet to fully retire expect they will need an income of £30,525 a year when they stop working, which means individuals need to fill a gap of £18,000 every year with pension and other savings.

Analysis of the Department for Work and Pensions survey, called ‘Planning and Preparing for Later Life 2024’, revealed the large gap people need to fill between their income aspirations in retirement and the amount provided by the state pension.

Pre-retirees expect they will need £30,525 to live on in later life. But a single pensioner today on £30,000 per annum will be in the top 15 percent of pensioner income, according to the analysis by consultancy Broadstone.

The state pension provides a maximum income of £11,973 a year, so to attain a yearly income of £30,525, an individual’s pensions and savings must plug a yearly gap of £18,552.

The consultants said that if all of this money was to be provided by purchasing an annuity at the age of 66, an individual’s pension savings would need to be around £330,000. 

However, the DWP survey showed that 27 percent of pre-retirees expected that the state pension would deliver more than 70 percent of their retirement income, while 15 percent thought it would provide more than 90 percent.

Further survey data revealed that 26 percent of retirees aged 40-75 said that they felt financially worse off in retirement than they had expected.

David Brooks, head of policy at financial services consultancy Broadstone, said: “This analysis shows a disconnect between people’s expectation of their income needs and the savings required to secure that income.

“In general, people are over-estimating what is an achievable and necessary income in retirement. While we don’t want to deter savers from targeting over £30,000 a year, that objective needs to be based on reality and the ability to balance needs both pre and post-retirement.

RELATED POSTS

health screening, NHS, employee benefits, wellbeing, preventative, health checks

Employer uptake of health screening rises as over half a million miss NHS checks

Digital-riches-lost-pension-savings-money-retirement

Employees want support to better understand how much to save for retirement

“There is possibly also an underestimation of the savings required to reach these income goals with a large gap needed to bridge what the State Pension will provide and what people believe they need in retirement.

“The purpose of the Pensions Commission will be to examine how they can enable people to save adequately so that they can contribute enough into their private pension or other savings vehicles.

“There are likely to be innovative mechanisms to achieve this beyond just ratcheting up mandatory employer and employee contributions such as the suggestion of pension side-car savings.”

Next Post
Older worker, over 50, ageism, ageist, bias, Diversity, inclusion, building

Could 80 become the new state pension age? Experts say it's not off the table

Digital pension, dashboard, online savings

Three more big names connect to the pensions dashboard as momentum builds

SUMMIT

BENEFITS UNBOXED PODCAST

Benefits Unboxed
Benefits Unboxed

The podcast from Benefits Expert, the title for HR, reward and benefits professionals.

Seasoned professionals examine the challenges and innovations in today’s employee benefits, reward and HR sector. Every episode, they will unbox a key issue and unpack what it really means for employers and how they can tackle it.

The regulars are Claire Churchard, editor of Benefits Expert; Carole Goldsmith, HR director at the Royal Horticultural Society, and Steve Herbert, consultant and rewards & benefits veteran.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
byBenefits Expert from Definite Article Media

Return-to-office mandates are a topic that’s generating plenty of heat in the media, but how closely do the headlines match workplace reality? 

In this episode, one of a three-part series of 10-minute podcasts, hosts Claire Churchard and Steve Herbert discuss data that shows remote or home working is on the rise.

We look at what this means for HR, from balancing employee flexibility with business needs, to ensuring benefits packages remain fair and accessible. We discuss the pinch points, and the opportunities, in building the new normal of work.

Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
Benefits Unboxed – Hybrid work: reality versus rhetoric
31/08/2025
Benefits Expert from Definite Article Media
Search Results placeholder

GUIDE TO WORKPLACE PENSIONS



REQUEST A FREE COPY

OPINION

Steve Herbert, consultant, ambassador, reward, benefits, HR strategy

Steve Herbert: The art of the deal?

Lorna Ferrie, legal and compliance director, Mauve Group

Lorna Ferrie: hybrid is not a loophole, remote teams can’t ignore the pay transparency push

Holly Coe, Innecto Reward Consulting

Holly Coe: friendship is an overlooked superpower when tackling workplace absenteeism

Vitality. Pippa Andrews

Pippa Andrews: how to make exercise more enjoyable for women

SUBSCRIBE

Benefits Expert

© 2024 Definite Article Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Follow Benefits Expert

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • In depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
  • Global rewards
  • Financial benefits
  • Health & wellbeing
  • Diversity & Inclusion